After the COVID-19 pandemic stopped many asylum procedures throughout Europe, new technologies are reviving these systems. Out of lie recognition tools examined at the border to a program for confirming documents and transcribes interviews, a wide range of technology is being employed in asylum applications. This article explores find more how these solutions have reshaped the ways asylum procedures are conducted. This reveals how asylum seekers will be transformed into compelled hindered techno-users: They are asked to abide by a series of techno-bureaucratic steps also to keep up with capricious tiny within criteria and deadlines. This kind of obstructs their capacity to browse through these systems and to pursue their right for safeguard.
It also shows how these kinds of technologies are embedded in refugee governance: They accomplish the ‘circuits of financial-humanitarianism’ that function through a whirlwind of dispersed technological requirements. These requirements increase asylum seekers’ socio-legal precarity by simply hindering these people from opening the programs of safety. It further states that examines of securitization and victimization should be put together with an insight in to the disciplinary mechanisms worth mentioning technologies, by which migrants will be turned into data-generating subjects exactly who are regimented by their reliance on technology.
Drawing on Foucault’s notion of power/knowledge and comarcal understanding, the article states that these solutions have an natural obstructiveness. There is a double effect: whilst they assist to expedite the asylum method, they also help to make it difficult with regards to refugees to navigate these types of systems. They are positioned in a ‘knowledge deficit’ that makes these people vulnerable to illegitimate decisions made by non-governmental stars, and ill-informed and unreliable narratives about their instances. Moreover, they pose new risks of’machine mistakes’ which may result in erroneous or discriminatory outcomes.
